The Numbers
Clearview AI has scraped 50 billion photos from social media, news sites, and the open web [1]. Law enforcement has run over 2 million searches against this database [2]. The company owes more than €100 million in unpaid fines to European regulators, and keeps operating anyway.
In October 2025, the UK reinstated a £7.5 million fine against Clearview. The same month, Austrian privacy group Noyb filed a criminal complaint. Clearview's response? Announce a new $10 million federal contract.
What Clearview AI Actually Is
Clearview AI is a facial recognition company that built its database by scraping billions of photos from:
- Facebook (before and after policy changes)
- Twitter/X
- News websites
- Personal blogs
- Any publicly accessible image
Upload a photo, and Clearview returns matches from across the internet, often with links to social media profiles, names, and associated images. It's reverse image search weaponized for surveillance.
The Scale of Police Use
50 Billion
Photos scraped and indexed in Clearview's database
2+ Million
Searches run by law enforcement (as of mid-2024)
3,100+
Law enforcement agencies with access
$10 Million
New federal contract announced September 2025
By early 2023, Clearview reported nearly 1 million police searches [3]. That number doubled by mid-2024 to over 2 million. Growth is accelerating, not slowing.
Who Uses Clearview
Federal Agencies
- ICE: Uses Clearview for deportation operations
- FBI: Access through federal contracts
- CBP: $225K contract for 15 licenses at National Targeting Center (February 2026)
- DEA: Drug investigations
- Department of Defense: Multiple contracts
State and Local Police
- NYPD: Documented use despite initial denials
- Chicago PD: Ongoing access
- Los Angeles County Sheriff: Used for investigations
- Thousands of smaller departments: Often without public knowledge
Foreign Governments
- Ukraine: Uses Clearview to identify Russian soldiers and casualties
- Multiple undisclosed countries: International contracts
The Legal Battles
Clearview has been fined, sued, and banned across multiple jurisdictions. It has paid almost none of the penalties.
European Fines (Unpaid)
France
€20 million fine (2022)
Status: Unpaid
Italy
€20 million fine (2022)
Status: Unpaid
Greece
€20 million fine (2022)
Status: Unpaid
Netherlands
€30.5 million fine (2024)
Status: Unpaid
Total European fines: Over €100 million. Amount paid: Zero.
Clearview's position: It has no physical presence in Europe, so European regulators can't enforce their rulings. The fines exist on paper while business continues.
UK Fine Reinstated (October 2025)
The UK Information Commissioner's Office originally fined Clearview £7.5 million in 2022. Clearview appealed. In October 2025, the appeals tribunal reinstated the fine, rejecting Clearview's arguments [4].
The UK ruling confirmed:
- Clearview processed UK residents' data without consent
- The company failed to use the data fairly
- No lawful basis existed for the scraping
- Clearview must delete UK residents' data
Whether Clearview will actually pay or comply remains unclear.
Criminal Complaint (October 2025)
Austrian privacy advocacy group Noyb filed a criminal complaint against Clearview CEO Hoan Ton-That [5]. The complaint alleges:
- Violation of GDPR provisions that carry criminal penalties in Austria
- Continued processing of European data despite regulatory orders
- Deliberate non-compliance with data protection law
Max Schrems, Noyb's founder: The complaint aims to establish that executives can face personal criminal liability for privacy violations, not just corporate fines that companies ignore.
How Clearview Integrates With ICE
Clearview isn't just a standalone tool. It's part of a larger ICE surveillance infrastructure:
- Initial identification: ICE agent uploads a photo to Clearview
- Database match: Clearview returns potential matches with social media links
- Identity confirmation: Agent cross-references with other databases (Palantir, LexisNexis)
- Location tracking: Data brokers, Flock license plate readers, utility records
- Arrest execution: ICE conducts targeted enforcement
A social media photo from 2015 can identify someone. Data broker records reveal their current address. License plate readers confirm their car's location. Clearview is the first link in the chain.
The Illinois BIPA Settlement
In 2022, Clearview settled a class action lawsuit in Illinois for violations of the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) [6]. The settlement:
- Banned Clearview from selling to most private businesses in the US
- Required opt-out mechanisms for Illinois residents
- Didn't affect government or law enforcement sales
The settlement created a two-tier system: private companies can't buy Clearview searches, but police departments can. Your employer can't use Clearview to identify you, but ICE can.
The September 2025 Federal Contract
While European regulators issue fines and Noyb files criminal complaints, the US government keeps buying. In September 2025, Clearview announced a $10 million federal contract, its largest single deal [7].
The contract came as:
- ICE ramps up deportation operations
- CBP expands biometric collection at borders
- The administration pushes for 3,000 daily arrests
Clearview's domestic business is growing precisely because its surveillance capabilities align with federal enforcement priorities.
What Clearview Knows About You
If you've ever posted a photo online, or been tagged in one, Clearview likely has your face indexed. This includes:
- Profile photos from any social network
- Tagged photos on friends' accounts
- News coverage where you appear
- Event photos posted publicly
- Professional headshots on company websites
- Photos from years ago on defunct platforms
Deleting your social media doesn't remove your face from Clearview's database. Once scraped, the data persists indefinitely.
Can You Remove Your Data?
Clearview offers an opt-out process, but it's limited:
- Visit Clearview's privacy page
- Submit a photo of yourself for identification
- Request deletion from their database
The catch: To opt out, you must give Clearview another photo. Many privacy advocates recommend against this, you're confirming your identity to a company whose business model depends on identifying people.
California residents have additional rights under CCPA, and Illinois residents under BIPA. European residents have GDPR rights, which Clearview ignores.
The Accuracy Problem
Facial recognition systems consistently perform worse on:
- Women (higher false positive rates)
- People with darker skin (significantly higher error rates)
- Elderly individuals
- People with facial differences
Clearview claims high accuracy rates, but independent testing is limited. When police run 2 million searches against a database of 50 billion photos, even small error rates mean thousands of potential misidentifications.
Multiple cases of wrongful arrests from facial recognition have been documented. Clearview's scale magnifies this risk.
The Business Model
Clearview makes money by:
- Licensing to law enforcement: Per-search fees or subscription access
- Federal contracts: Multi-million dollar deals with agencies
- International sales: Government clients worldwide
The company doesn't pay for the photos it scrapes. It doesn't compensate people whose faces populate its database. It takes public images, builds a surveillance tool, and sells access to governments.
Your face is the product. Police are the customers. You're not part of the transaction.
What This Means for Privacy
Clearview represents a fundamental shift in surveillance capability:
Before Clearview:
- Police needed your name to find your photo
- Facial recognition required formal databases (DMV, mugshots)
- Matching faces to identities required manual work
After Clearview:
- Police need your photo to find your name
- Every public photo is a searchable surveillance record
- Identity matching is instant and automated
The right to anonymity in public spaces, walking down the street without being identified, is technologically obsolete. Clearview didn't create surveillance; it automated and scaled it.
The Resistance
States With Biometric Laws
- Illinois BIPA: Strongest protection, requires consent before biometric collection
- Texas: Biometric privacy law with state enforcement
- Washington: Biometric identifier protections
These laws forced Clearview's settlement and limit some commercial use. But law enforcement carve-outs remain.
Cities With Facial Recognition Bans
Multiple cities have banned government facial recognition:
- San Francisco
- Oakland
- Boston
- Portland (Oregon)
- Minneapolis
These bans prevent local police from using tools like Clearview, though federal agencies operating in those cities are unaffected.
Protecting Yourself
Limit Future Exposure
- Minimize public photos: Reduce new images added to the internet
- Review tagged photos: Untag yourself on others' posts
- Adjust privacy settings: Limit who can see photos on social platforms
- Consider image removal services: Some services request deletion from data brokers
Existing Photos
Photos already scraped likely can't be removed. Clearview's database is a one-way accumulation.
Support Legislative Action
- Federal facial recognition law: Currently doesn't exist
- State biometric laws: Support expansion to more states
- Law enforcement restrictions: Push for limits on police facial recognition
The Future
Clearview continues expanding despite fines, lawsuits, and bans. The company is betting that:
- European fines will remain unenforceable
- US law enforcement demand will keep growing
- No federal regulation will pass
- The technology will become too embedded to remove
50 billion photos. 2 million police searches. €100 million in unpaid fines. A $10 million federal contract.
That's not a company being regulated. That's a company winning.
Related Articles
- CBP Signs Clearview AI Contract for 60 Billion Faces, CBP’s National Targeting Center gets 15 licenses for “tactical targeting”
- ICE Just Bought Access to 60 Billion Stolen Faces, ICE’s $9.2 million Clearview AI contract
- ICE Facial Recognition for Real-Time Deportation
- ICE's Complete Surveillance Tech Stack
- US Facial Recognition Bans
- Facial Recognition: The Biometric Prison
- UK Facial Recognition Expansion 2025
References
- New York Times - The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It
- Biometric Update - Clearview AI reports 2 million searches by law enforcement (June 2024)
- The Verge - Clearview AI approaches 1 million police searches
- UK ICO - Clearview AI £7.5 million fine reinstated (October 2025)
- Noyb - Criminal complaint against Clearview AI (October 2025)
- ACLU - Clearview AI Illinois BIPA Settlement (2022)
- Clearview AI - Federal contract announcement (September 2025)