Today's Top Stories:
- FISA 702: 15 days to sunset, vote delayed past recess. House GOP couldn't get the votes before the break. They'll rush it the week before expiry, or let it lapse. Rep. Luna says she'll kill the bill unless the SAVE Act rides along.
- ODNI drops new transparency numbers. The intelligence community's 13th annual report shows Section 702 surveillance targets increased again in 2025. FBI queries ticked up slightly too.
- Meta's facial recognition deadline is tomorrow. Senators Markey, Wyden, and Merkley want answers on smart glasses surveillance. 60+ groups oppose it. Radio silence from Menlo Park.
- France's Senate passes under-15 social media ban. Platforms deemed harmful to kids would face mandatory age verification and account bans.
- COPPA compliance clock: 17 days. Updated children's privacy rules (including biometric protections) take effect April 22.
- Seattle deactivates surveillance cameras and blocks ICE from city data. City council voted 6-3 to shut down 62 CCTV cameras and unanimously barred immigration enforcement access to surveillance systems.
15 Days: Congress Left Town With Warrantless Spying Still on the Clock
Section 702 of FISA expires April 20. Fifteen days from now. And House Republican leaders just sent everyone home for a two-week recess without scheduling a vote [1].
The math collapsed. GOP leadership wanted a clean 18-month extension: no reforms, no warrant requirements, just keep the warrantless surveillance program running. But they couldn't get past their own caucus. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna publicly threatened to block the procedural rule vote unless the SAVE Act (a voter citizenship proof bill pushed by Trump) gets attached to the FISA reauthorization. Several other GOP holdouts want actual surveillance reforms before they'll vote yes [2].
On the other side, 98 House Democrats in the Congressional Progressive Caucus formally oppose any clean extension. The CPC wants warrant requirements for querying Americans' communications, closure of the data broker loophole, and restrictions on backdoor searches. Without at least some of those reforms, they won't provide the Democratic votes Johnson needs to make up for Republican defections [3].
That means Congress will have to cram a vote into the first week back (the week before expiry) or let the authority lapse. The Government Surveillance Reform Act from Senators Wyden and Lee is sitting there as the reform option: warrants for Americans' data, data broker loophole closed, chatbot record protections. But leadership hasn't brought it to the floor [4].
Last week, a gutted PCLOB, down to one member, released a staff report endorsing 702. This week, Congress left town. The pattern is clear: everyone who benefits from warrantless surveillance wants to run out the clock and force a last-minute clean extension.
Related: Yesterday's PCLOB Analysis | Government Surveillance Reform Act | 98 Democrats Oppose Clean Extension | The SAFE Act Is Back
Intelligence Community Quietly Admits: Surveillance Targets Are Still Climbing
The ODNI released its 13th Annual Statistical Transparency Report on April 1, covering the intelligence community's use of FISA Section 702 and other surveillance authorities for calendar year 2025. Buried in the timing: four days after the PCLOB endorsed warrantless spying and 19 days before 702 expires [5].
The headlines the IC wants you to see: FBI U.S. person queries increased "slightly" from the immediate prior period but remain "lower than previous years." The court issued three new 702 orders during 2025, including a new counternarcotics certification that the FISC initially denied in February before approving in April [6].
The number they're burying: Section 702 targets increased again. The report confirms a continued upward trend "consistent with increases seen in previous annual reports." That's government-speak for "we're surveilling more foreign nationals every year, and the incidental collection of Americans' communications goes up proportionally."
The report drops at a convenient moment. The intelligence community gets to point to compliance stats and declining FBI query numbers while Congress debates whether to extend the program. Meanwhile, the actual scope of surveillance (the number of people targeted) keeps growing.
Two-thirds of the President's Daily Brief contained 702-derived intelligence in 2025, according to the PCLOB report from last week. The IC has made itself dependent on warrantless surveillance. That's not an argument for keeping it. It's an argument for asking why.
Meta Has 24 Hours to Explain Facial Recognition on Smart Glasses
Tomorrow, April 6, is the deadline Senators Markey, Wyden, and Merkley set for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to respond to their questions about facial recognition plans for Ray-Ban smart glasses [7].
The senators want to know: Will Meta delete biometric data collected through the glasses? Is biometric data being used to train machine learning models? Has Meta conducted a privacy impact assessment? Will facial recognition data be shared with law enforcement? How does Meta plan to obtain consent from people who didn't choose to be scanned by someone else's glasses [8]?
Over 60 civil society organizations, led by the Consumer Federation of America and UltraViolet Action, sent letters to Meta, its partner EssilorLuxottica, the White House, the FTC, and the DOJ calling facial recognition on smart glasses "a creepy and unacceptable escalation of surveillance" [9].
Meanwhile, a Swedish media investigation revealed Meta subcontractors in Kenya are labeling bathroom footage and sexual content to train AI systems. The EFF published "Think Twice Before Buying Meta's Ray-Bans" last month. And North Yorkshire Police in the UK announced this week they're preparing to deploy live facial recognition across York, the same technology Meta wants to put on consumer eyewear [10].
Meta hasn't said a word. If tomorrow comes and goes without a response, that silence tells you everything about how seriously the company takes congressional oversight.
Related: 64 Groups Oppose Smart Glasses FR | Senator Deadline Coverage
Seattle Pulls the Plug on Surveillance Cameras and Blocks ICE From City Data
The Seattle City Council voted 6-3 on March 28 to deactivate the city's network of 62 surveillance cameras, citing resident concerns over privacy and civil liberties. On March 31, the council followed up unanimously with two more measures: a 60-day pause on data collection by any surveillance technology that could be used for immigration enforcement, and a bill limiting when Seattle Police can inquire about a person's immigration status [13].
Mayor Katie Wilson had already paused CCTV camera expansion earlier this year amid fears the cameras could target immigrants, with one exception for stadium areas ahead of the World Cup. But the council went further, voting to shut down existing cameras entirely [14].
Separately, Lynnwood became the first city in Washington state to cancel an active Flock Safety license plate reader contract. The 7-0 vote in February terminated a 25-camera network that had been offline since October, when police discovered outside agencies could search the system [15].
This is what pushback looks like. In a year where the federal government is expanding surveillance at every turn, two Washington cities decided the cameras aren't worth the cost to civil liberties.
Related: The Flock Rebellion: Cities Pull the Plug | Ring Killed the Flock Partnership
Quick Hits
- COPPA compliance deadline: April 22. Updated children's privacy rules take effect in 17 days. The FTC's amended COPPA Rule expands "personal information" to include biometric identifiers: fingerprints, voiceprints, facial templates, iris patterns. Companies get separate opt-in consent requirements for targeted advertising and third-party data sharing. If you run a platform that touches kids' data, the clock is ticking [16].
- CERT-EU confirms Trivy supply chain attack on European Commission. The April 3 analysis confirmed ShinyHunters exfiltrated 340GB of data from the Europa platform through a compromised version of the Trivy security scanner. Up to 71 EU entities affected: names, emails, personal data, contracts. An attacker used a security tool as the attack vector. Our Coverage [17]
- Ring-Flock fallout still shaking the surveillance industry. A Security Systems News survey found 90% of respondents say the Ring-Flock controversy is creating trust issues with customers. Amazon killed the partnership in February after the Super Bowl ad backlash, but the damage to consumer surveillance tech credibility is sticking [18].
- Montana's right-to-cure period expired April 1. Organizations that violated the Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act can no longer fix violations before facing enforcement. Montana joins the growing list of states with teeth behind their privacy laws.
- ATF Clearview AI hearing: April 8. Three days out from the House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on ATF's use of facial recognition to identify gun owners. GAO found 549+ searches with zero policy, zero training. The cross-partisan angle (Second Amendment meets Fourth Amendment) makes this one to watch [19].
What to Watch
- Tomorrow, April 6: Meta's senator deadline on facial recognition smart glasses. Expect silence or a non-answer.
- April 8: Congressional hearing on ATF's use of Clearview AI facial recognition on gun owners.
- April 20: FISA Section 702 sunset. 15 days. Congress on recess until the week before.
- April 22: Updated COPPA Rule compliance deadline. Biometric data protections for children take effect.
- May 4: EU CSAR trilogue: Chat Control 2.0 negotiations resume after the scanning framework officially expired yesterday.
- Developing: How are EU platforms responding to Chat Control expiry? Have Meta, Google, and Microsoft actually stopped scanning messages?
- Developing: European Commission breach impact assessment: 71 entities affected, GDPR implications for the body that enforces GDPR.
References
- The Hill - House GOP pushes FISA spy powers vote to April amid opposition
- Axios - FISA fight: Johnson, Luna clash over intelligence act extension
- State of Surveillance - 98 House Democrats Just Made Section 702's Future More Uncertain
- Sen. Wyden - Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026 Section-by-Section
- ODNI - 13th Annual Intelligence Community Transparency Report
- Intelligence Community News - ODNI Releases 13th Annual IC Transparency Report
- Senator Markey - Demand Transparency from Meta on Facial Recognition in Smart Glasses
- Gizmodo - Calls to Regulate Smart Glasses Are Officially Deafening
- Biometric Update - Meta facial recognition smart glasses plan sees increasing opposition
- York News Focus - Big Brother in North Yorkshire: Police plan facial recognition
- Euronews - France moves closer to social media ban for children under 15
- The Record - French Senate passes bill that would ban children under 15 from social media
- South Seattle Emerald - Seattle City Council Passes Bills Limiting Immigration Inquiries, Surveillance Use
- KIRO 7 - Seattle City Council votes to pause CCTV program
- KING 5 - Lynnwood votes to terminate Flock Safety camera contract after community backlash
- Toy Association - Updated COPPA Rule Requirements Take Effect April 22
- Help Net Security - Trivy supply chain attack enabled European Commission cloud breach
- Security Systems News - Surveillance controversy shakes trust
- Gun Owners of America - ATF Utilizes Facial Recognition Software to Identify Gun Owners
Last updated: April 5, 2026